NPM is seeing a disturbing increase
in the number of claims associated with a delay in diagnosis of
prostate cancer. Based
upon our own claims experience, there appear to be two primary issues
at play:
(1)
Most
claims have one significant factor in common.
They involve changing PSA test values in which the physician
takes no action.
(2)
Changing
PSA test results are often charted, but somehow are missed by the
physician, and PSA monitoring that generally would occur does not.
SUGGESTED
RISK MANAGEMENT MEASURES FOR THE PRACTITIONER
(1)
Make yourself aware of the current guidelines for PSA
monitoring and treatment. In
cases where you choose to consider age-adjusted values, be consistent
not only in your practice, but also preferably among all physicians
and allied health practitioners in your group.
(2)
Carefully document discussions that take place with patients
who choose to not have PSA testing done and, if it can be ascertained,
the patient’s reasoning. If
applicable, document all of your efforts to encourage testing.
You already know you and
your office staff carry the responsibility of knowing the status of
your patients’ health maintenance testing and whether they follow
through. Everyone is
grappling with this issue. Here
are some pointers that may prove helpful to your PSA tracking efforts.
PSA
OFFICE SYSTEM BASICS
- It is important that clinic leadership
and all clinic staff understand the entire process used to monitor
PSA values, which includes:
- The initial patient visit
- The medical decisions made that lead to
testing
- Performing the test
- Receiving the result
- Communicating the result and plan for
follow-up action to the patient. Follow-up plans can include
anything from periodic testing to initiating referrals.