|
PSA
Testing
October, 2002
Earlier this year, NPM devoted a Risk Management Tip to
the subject of PSA monitoring. Given the controversy that surrounds the
subject of PSA testing, a number of you called or wrote asking us to
restate our position regarding this matter. This Risk Management Tip seeks
to clarify what we believe to be important from a risk management
perspective when it comes to PSA testing.
The issue is as follows: NPM is seeing a disturbing
increase in the number of claims associated with a delay in diagnosis of
prostate cancer. Most of these claims have several significant factors in
common. They involve changing PSA test values where the physician takes no
action, i.e. increasing PSA levels to indisputable abnormal limits without
appropriate follow up or referral being initiated. Changing PSA test
results had been charted but were either missed or not acted upon in a
timely manner. In several instances system failures such as laboratory
reports being filed in the chart without the physician seeing the results
were also contributing factors to the claim.
As you are undoubtedly aware, differing recommendations
exist when it comes to performing PSA testing. When screening for prostate
cancer, the American Urologic Association and the American Cancer Society
recommend routine annual rectal exams and PSA's for men over the age of
50. Where a positive family history of prostate cancer is present (or
individuals are of African American descent) screening is recommended at
age 40. Other organizations, i.e. The Center for Disease Control (CDC),
have their own recommendations. The American Academy of Family Physicians
and the National Cancer Institute do not recommend routine PSA testing for
prostate cancer but encourage discussion of the benefits and limitations
of the test.
NPM TAKES NO POSITION WHEN IT COMES TO RECOMMENDING
ROUTINE PSA TESTING. However, we wish to stress the importance of
recognizing and dealing with changing PSA results IF you and your patient
decide to test. When you discuss PSA testing with your patients make
certain that the PAR (procedure-alternatives-risks) discussion is
thorough. It is important to carefully document the key discussion and
decision points that were mutually agreed upon.
New variations such as age adjusted PSA's, PSA
velocity, total and Free PSA may also be used to determine normal and
abnormal values. These may be important considerations in deciding what is
most appropriate for your patients. Whatever you and your patient decide,
make certain the discussion and decisions reached are adequately
documented.
In those instances where PSA testing is performed, be
certain to follow-up abnormal test results in a timely manner with
thorough treatment plan discussions held with the patient; repeat testing
where indicated and initiate referrals as appropriate.
|