|
The Peer Review Process
May, 1998Sometimes criticism of another
providers care, even if it is unintentional, can be the motivating factor in a
medical malpractice action being initiated. Patients often take such criticism to heart
and feel that if another physicians care would have been different, then the
treating physician somehow failed to treat them properly. This feeling is especially
prevalent when the patient has experienced a bad outcome. They are looking for a reason,
or someone, to blame for their experience. Criticism of the treating physicians
care, or lack thereof, often provides the patient with such a reason.
If you have an unexpected outcome, concerns regarding care
given by another practitioner or other patient care concerns, we encourage you to utilize
the peer review process rather than making comments to the patient. The peer review
process provides a confidential forum for physicians to discuss and evaluate patient care.
It enables members to engage in open, frank discussions about specific incidents without
fear that the information will be used against them in the event of a lawsuit.
The peer review process is afforded legal protection
because it is such a valuable tool in identifying patient care concerns and preventing
their re-occurrence. As such, information gathered through the peer review process is
confidential and cannot be obtained by subpoena or used in medical malpractice
proceedings. In 1995, Oregon extended such protection to physician groups or clinics who
choose to participate in peer review with ORS 41.675. A copy of the statute is available,
upon request, from our office. The law protects discussions and information gathered by
the committee, rather than discussions by individual members. Thus, all sharing of
confidential information should be done in a formal committee meeting.
To enjoy the full benefit of peer review protection, a
properly structured peer review committee with appropriately appointed members must be
formed. The committee should maintain a predetermined schedule and allow for ad hoc
meetings as needed. A meeting notebook to record the date, time and subject of each
meeting should also be kept. If issues involve a physician outside of the facility be sure
to notify that person of the meeting and invite them to attend.
Remember: Utilize the peer review process any time
there is a quality of care issue that needs to be addressed.
|
|